Aysegul Kilicli | Anova | Best Researcher Award

Best Researcher Award

Aysegul Kilicli – Gaziantep University Faculty of Health Sciences, Turkey

Aysegul Kilicli
Affiliation Gaziantep University Faculty of Health Sciences
Country Turkey
Scopus ID 57221392337
Documents 18
Citations 32
h-index 4
Subject Area ANOVA
Event International Research Data Analysis Excellence & Awards
ORCID 0000-0003-1105-9991

Aysegul Kilicli is a researcher affiliated with Gaziantep University Faculty of Health Sciences, Turkey. Her academic profile includes research outputs indexed in Scopus, with 18 documents, 32 citations, and an h-index of 4, as reported in the supplied profile information. This article presents her research background, scholarly contributions, and recognition context. [1]

Abstract

This article presents the academic profile of Aysegul Kilicli, affiliated with Gaziantep University Faculty of Health Sciences in Turkey. It summarizes supplied bibliometric information, identifies her stated subject area as analysis of variance (ANOVA), and outlines research contributions and award relevance. Publication-level details require verification through authoritative scholarly records. [2]

Keywords

Aysegul Kilicli; Best Researcher Award; research data analysis; analysis of variance; ANOVA; health sciences; academic research; bibliometrics; scholarly publications; research impact; Gaziantep University; Turkey.

Introduction

Aysegul Kilicli is affiliated with Gaziantep University Faculty of Health Sciences in Turkey. Her academic profile is presented in connection with the Best Researcher Award and the International Research Data Analysis Excellence & Awards. This overview introduces her research background using the supplied profile details and bibliometric indicators. [3]

Research Profile

Kilicli’s supplied academic profile identifies Gaziantep University Faculty of Health Sciences as her institutional affiliation and Turkey as her country. Her listed subject area is ANOVA, a statistical method used to examine differences among group means. Her Scopus profile provides a reference point for reviewing indexed scholarly output. [1]

Research Contributions

Research contributions are assessed through the questions addressed, methods applied, findings reported, and relevance to the scholarly field. The supplied profile associates Kilicli with ANOVA and health sciences. Evaluating individual contributions requires examining her publications, research designs, results, and documented applications rather than relying solely on bibliometric indicators. [2]

Publications

The supplied Scopus information lists 18 documents associated with Aysegul Kilicli. These records may include different scholarly publication types, and individual titles, dates, coauthors, and journals should be checked directly against the indexed author profile. A verified publication list is necessary for describing specific research topics and findings accurately. [3]

Research Impact

The supplied bibliometric indicators report 32 citations and an h-index of 4. Citation counts can indicate scholarly attention, while the h-index combines publication productivity and citation distribution. These measures vary over time and across disciplines, so they should be interpreted alongside research quality, methodological rigor, collaboration, and broader academic contributions. [1]

Award Suitability

The Best Researcher Award recognizes research activity and scholarly contributions. Kilicli’s supplied affiliation and bibliometric indicators provide background information for consideration. A complete assessment would also examine publication quality, originality, research significance, ethical standards, and documented contributions. Eligibility and final selection remain subject to the award organizer’s published criteria. [2]

Conclusion

Aysegul Kilicli’s supplied profile identifies her institutional affiliation, research area, and Scopus indicators. These details provide an introductory overview of her academic record in health sciences and research data analysis. Further evaluation should use verified publications, documented research outcomes, and the official award criteria to establish the scope and significance of her work. [3]

References

  1. Effect of Reflexology on Pain, Fatigue, Sleep Quality, and Lactation in Postpartum Primiparous Women After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38426483/
  2. Stress, Anxiety, and Postpartum Depression in Parents with Premature Infants in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37404210/
  3. Comparison of sexual self-consciousness, self-confidence, self-efficacy, satisfaction, and dyadic adjustment between people living with HIV and HIV-negative individuals: Case–control study.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/403338666_